LeetCode - Search in Rotated Sorted Array
Problem description
Suppose an array sorted in ascending order is rotated at some pivot unknown to you beforehand.
(i.e., [0,1,2,4,5,6,7] might become [4,5,6,7,0,1,2]).
You are given a target value to search. If found in the array return its index, otherwise return -1.
You may assume no duplicate exists in the array.
Your algorithm’s runtime complexity must be in the order of O(log n).
Example 1:
1
2
Input: nums = [4,5,6,7,0,1,2], target = 0
Output: 4
Example 2:
1
2
Input: nums = [4,5,6,7,0,1,2], target = 3
Output: -1
Analysis
Basic idea it to use binary search, and judge which part should go next.
Here’s the code:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
public class SearchinRotatedSortedArray {
public int search(int[] nums, int target) {
return binarySearch(nums, target, 0, nums.length - 1);
}
int binarySearch(int[] nums, int target, int left, int right) {
if (left < 0 || right < 0 || left >= nums.length || right >= nums.length) {
return -1;
}
int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
if (nums[mid] == target) {
return mid;
} else if (nums[left] == target) {
return left;
} else if (nums[right] == target) {
return right;
} else {
if (nums[left] < nums[right]) {
if (target < nums[mid]) {
return binarySearch(nums, target, left + 1, mid - 1);
} else {
return binarySearch(nums, target, mid + 1, right - 1);
}
} else {
if (nums[mid] > nums[left]) {
if (target > nums[mid] || target < nums[right]) {
return binarySearch(nums, target, mid + 1, right - 1);
} else {
return binarySearch(nums, target, left + 1, mid - 1);
}
} else {
if (target > nums[right] || target < nums[mid]) {
return binarySearch(nums, target, left + 1, mid - 1);
} else {
return binarySearch(nums, target, mid + 1, right - 1);
}
}
}
}
}
}
However, this is a ugly code, we only have to consider the increasing part and use else to go to the other disordered part.
Here’s the sample code from LeetCode:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
class Solution {
public int search(int[] nums, int target) {
int start = 0, end = nums.length - 1;
while (start <= end) {
int mid = start + (end - start) / 2;
if (nums[mid] == target) return mid;
else if (nums[mid] >= nums[start]) {
if (target >= nums[start] && target < nums[mid]) end = mid - 1;
else start = mid + 1;
}
else {
if (target <= nums[end] && target > nums[mid]) start = mid + 1;
else end = mid - 1;
}
}
return -1;
}
}
What to improve
- should use else in a wise way